Ventilation of attic spaces is viewed by many in the roofing industry as a technical requirement for steep-slope roof assemblies and often is substantiated as being a building code requirement. But this viewpoint is changing.
Code change
During the International Code Council's (ICC's) 2003-04 code development cycle, the U.S. Department of Energy submitted and ICC accepted sweeping changes to ICC's energy-efficiency requirements, including a provision in the International Residential Code (IRC) allowing unvented attics, or "conditioned attic assemblies," in certain situations.
As a result, the upcoming 2006 edition of IRC will allow unvented, conditioned attics when the following four conditions are met:
Rationale
An extensive discussion of the rationale behind the unvented, conditioned attic concept was presented by Joseph Lstiburek, principal with Building Science Corp., Westford, Mass., at an education program held during the 2005 International Roofing Expo.
Advocates of the unvented, conditioned attics concept contend by moving the ceiling air and thermal barriers to the roof plane, better building airtightness can be achieved, and it takes a "whole house" approach to building moisture control. Also, for houses where air handler and ductwork systems are located in attics, the effect of ductwork air leakage is negated when systems are placed in conditioned attics. Such air leakage typically accounts for 10 percent to 20 percent of air handler flow. This also offsets the increased volume of conditioned space created.
Some roofing professionals criticize the unvented, conditioned attic concept. They contend the increased roof surface temperatures that result from nonvented deck substrates will cause premature roof system deterioration, particularly with bitumen-based roofing products, such as asphalt shingles. Although roof surface temperatures will be higher over unvented, conditioned attics, the amounts of these temperature increases are less than or equal to the amounts attributable to other readily identifiable sources, including building location, building orientation and roof surface color. For additional information, see "What's the value of ventilation?" March 2002 issue, page 20.
Closing thoughts
With the publication and implementation of IRC's 2006 edition, an alternative to conventional attic ventilation—unvented, conditioned attics—will be available.
NRCA maintains its longstanding recommendation to provide proper ventilation of attic spaces. However, NRCA is evaluating the unvented, conditioned attic concept and may consider revising its attic ventilation recommendations.
Mark S. Graham is NRCA's associate executive director of technical services.
COMMENTS
Be the first to comment. Please log in to leave a comment.